Log on:
Powered by Elgg



Economics :: Blog :: Archives

February 2008

February 18, 2008

Scarcity of resources necessitates trade-offs, and trade-offs result in an opportunity costs.  Any decision that involves a choice between two or more options has an opportunity cost. 

The concept of ‘opportunity costs’ can be shown by using a Production Possibility Curve.  The Production Possibility Curve depicts the best possible combinations of two or more goods an economy can produce using all of the available resources.  It shows the trade-off between more of one good in terms of another.  The law of increasing opportunity costs is reflected in the shape of the Production Possibility Curve.  The curve is bowed out, which shows that when an economy wants to produce more of one product it must give up successively larger amounts of the other products it makes.  The slope of the curve conveys the trade-off in terms of opportunity cost of producing one good rather than another.  

Resources are not all the same.  For example, if an economy was producing say motor vehicles and nuts, some of its resources will be better suited for producing motor vehicles while others are better suited for gathering nuts.  Some people (resources) will be really good at gathering nuts, for example people who love to be outdoors instead of indoors, while others like to work inside on cars.  In large economies if we started to withdraw resources from one product for another product, eventually we would reassign those whose opportunity costs are highest, which shows the general principle that when resources have different costs, we should always exploit the resource with the lowest opportunity cost first.  This is called the ‘low hanging fruit principle’ which says when expanding the production of any good, first employ those resources with the lowest opportunity cost, and only afterward turn to resources with higher opportunity costs.

Because resources are not equally productive in all possible uses, shifting resources from one use to another brings the law of increasing opportunity costs into play.  The production of additional units of one product requires the sacrifice of increasing amounts of the other products so a society should first employ those resources that are relatively efficient at producing that good, only afterward turning to those that are less efficient.

Posted by Joanne @ Economics | 4 comment(s)

February 25, 2008

Dear Economics Community

Could you please answer me whether the following statement is true, false or uncertain and illustrate by graph please?

“Other things equal, an IS curve is steeper, the more sensitive consumption is to the rate of interest”. True, false or uncertain? Briefly explain your answer.

As I am stuck with some questions. I break them into topics. I hope you can respond to me quickly. Thanks, Katie
__________________

Katie,

This is a commonly asked question regarding the IS curve since it examines the very basis of the IS curve. The IS curve shows the combination of interest rates and national income that result in equilibrium in the goods market. The IS curve slopes downward because increases in the interest rate cause investment to fall, and thus reduce income through the multiplier:

(IS)    Y = C(Y, t) + I(i) + G + X(R) -M(R, Y), where R is the real exchange rate (eP* /P)


The slope depends of the responsiveness of investment to changes in the interest rate, and the magnitude of the autonomous investment multiplier. You plot Interest Rates on the Y-axis and National Income on the X-axis. Steepness then increases as the impact of interest rates decreases.

 

IS Curve 

Curve IS is not as steep as curve IS1. IS shows more impact on national income due to changes in interest rate, so LESS steepenss means MORE sensistivity.

Keywords: chart, curve, graph, income, income sensitivity, income sensitivity curve, interest, interest and income, interest and national income, IS, IS Curve, macroeconomics, national income, sensitivity, steep, steepness

Posted by Economics | 0 comment(s)

February 26, 2008

How about this one: 

“A given increase in the money supply will shift the LM curve farther to the right if money demand is more sensitive to the level of income”. True, false or uncertain? Briefly explain your answer.
Thanks, Katie

_____________

An increase in the money supply shifts the LM curve to the right, raising income and lowering the interest rate. It seems to me that if money demand is more sensitive to the level of income, this will reduce the shift of the LM curve to the right.

Keywords: curve, demand, equilibrium, increase, increase money supply, LM, LM Curve, macroeconomics, money supply, shift curve, shift LM Curve

Posted by Professor Cram @ Economics | 0 comment(s)

February 27, 2008

Dear Professor Cram,

Could you please answer the following question for me?

Suppose that the public holds a cash/deposit ration of  cp = 0.2, and the commercial banking sector holds a reserve/deposit ration of cb = 0.2.  The monetary base is given by H = 50.

Find the value of the money multiplier and the total amount of money in the economy. How does the money multiplier change if the central bank raises the reserve requirement to cb = 0.3? Briefly explain the economic reasoning for this change in the money multiplier.

____________

 

The Multiplier (M) for money is (1+Cp)/(Cp + Cb).

When Cp=0 the formula reduces to its simpler form of the inverse of reserves, or 1/ Cb.

For your question, we start with

Cp = 0.2 and  Cb = 0.2 so the multiplier is (1+0.2)/(0.2+0.2) = 1.2/0.4 = 3

The total money in the economy is M·H = 3·50 = 150

When the banking reserve requirement is increased to 0.3 the multiplier drops:

(1+0.2)/(0.2+0.3) = 1.2/0.5 = 2.4

This will reduce the total amount of money in the economy.

I hope this helps.

Good studying.

Keywords: 1/R, 1/r, bank reserve, base, cash, cash holding, central bank, change in money multiplier, M, macroeconomics, monetary, monetary base, money and banking, money in the economy, money multiplier, multiple, public cash, reserve requirement, reserves

Posted by Professor Cram @ Economics | 0 comment(s)

Vote for College-Cram!

Advertise with us