Between wrapping up the spring semester and starting my summer "vacation" plans, I changed my profile page to include links to some of the most popular articles I've written over the years.

In case you hadn't seen them all, here they are:

• Best Ways to Cheat in College
• Seven Keys to Getting Better Grades
• How to Write a Killer Essay
• How to Take Good Notes
• How to Work with Word Problems
- - - - - - - - - - - -
• Seven Keys to Writing a Better Resume
• Seven Keys to Ace Your Next Job Interview
• Secret Behind Textbook Costs
• Finding a Holiday Job
• Giving an Oral Presentation
• How I Spent My Summer Vacation

Enjoy these, there are plenty more where they came from.
 

Last year the Republican and Democratic national committees laid down the rules for when states could schedule their primaries. Florida and Michigan both decided unilaterally that they were not going to wait until after Super Tuesday and scheduled their primaries early. Both states were tired of the races being over before they got their say, and felt states like theirs with important voting blocks should have a say in the primary outcomes.

Both committees threatened sanctions against the states, and neither side backed down. So now we stand mired in a quandary: if the committees stand firm they risk alienating large voting blocks; if they give in, pandemonium will ensue next primary season as every state ignores the committee guidelines. Face it, coverage of the last several Democratic primaries have all had similar themes -- "this is the first time West Virginia has had a say in the primary..." States dig this opportunity, and at the local level this gets more people interested in registering and voting.

I don't know how this will play out for this year. (Personally I think every registered voter who wants to vote should be able to do so, and that vote should count.) For next time, though, I propose a solution before the problems start.

• Let Iowa and New Hampshire go first, they'll have a fit otherwise. As every parent knows, sometimes you just have to let the little ones have their way if you want any peace.
• For the rest of the states, schedule primary dates for Super Tuesday, not so super Monday, etc. so that you have the right number of total primaries.
• Hold a lottery draw to fill in the slots for those primaries. This way, Montana and South Dakota and New Mexico won't always be the last ones -- they could luck into a Super Tuesday slot!

Food for thought... Anticipate the problem and come up with a solution BEFORE it rears its ugly head.
 

The latest issue of Time carries the story "Is it time to invade Burma?" They describe the devastation of Cyclone Nargis as it slammed into the Irrawaddy Delta last week, and the inability/unwillingness of the military junta to embrace international aid to their stricken populace.

Is the answer here to "force" assistance? Is the answer to render aid in spite of the wishes of the Burmese government? This is a hard one to swallow. On one hand, the humanitarian perspective says "it is easier to ask for forgiveness than permission." On the other hand, the "rightness" of forcing our values and sense of justice on a sovereign nation is at the core of the current opposition to the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan.

It isn't easy being the good guy... 

Democrats raised holy hell back in the presidential election of 2001, where voting irregularities in Florida were cited as evidence that not all votes were being counted. It's somewhat ironic that the same issue has once again raised its ugly head in this year's primary season, only this time it's Florida and Michigan voters that are being disenfranchised. The main difference, of course, is that a large portion of the Democratic faithful (those who pull for Obama) are the ones being accused by a different large portion of the Democratic faithful (those pulling for Hillary) of ignoring the will of the people.

Amidst this ongoing tempest, it's interesting to see that in yesterday's Guam primary the difference between winner Barack Obama and loser Hillary Clinton was a scant seven votes. SEVEN. That's like a few friends who decided to vote before going to a movie.

I guess every vote does count, as long as you don't live in Florida or Michigan. 

I read an interesting article this morning on the UW Oshkosh website entitled "Publishers: Professor Drive Up Book Prices" that had me laughing out loud.

A regional manager from a major textbook publisher claimed that "the high cost of paper and fuel also contributed to a rise in text prices but said millions of dollars in profits are lost because professors practice book buying." Now I know this manager -- she's a very nice person, but I can't believe that she really believes the profs are at fault here.

A bit of background... A typical sales rep calls on hundreds of professors over the course of a semester, which is probably way too many to give each of them really good sales service and attention. So, the industry practice is the begin the semester selling season by shipping out thousands -- yes, I said thousands -- of free textbooks that their profs might be interested in. These are books that the profs probably haven't asked about, or for. They're just shipped out, thousands of books for free, so the sales reps can subsequently contact the prof and fish for the sale.

The cost of shipping these free books (called desk copies) is factored into the initial pricing decisions. In other words, the textbook publishers know beforehand that they will forego hundreds of thousands of dollars in sales by sending these textbooks out for free.

Now comes the fun part. The prof, who never asked for the book to begin with and may not even think it's any good, gets asked by a third-party book buyer if s/he has any textbooks they want to sell. When was the last time you were in a prof's office? It isn't like they have lots of room for these unwanted books, so they say sure. (They were probably going to be thrown out anyway.)

So suddenly the professors are at fault for cleaning unwanted, unsolicited textbooks out their office?

One of the things I learned in business classes is not to blame your customers for your own problems. It doesn't help you solve anything, and you run the risk of alienating your customers. Perhaps the textbook publishers ought to refresh their business sense with one of their own textbooks.

No, this isn't about Star Wars. We had some pretty serious thunderstorm activity pass through here early this morning with torrential rains, lightning strikes, tornados, and sporadic wind damage scattered throughout the area. While College-Cram is hosted by a major hosting company, unfortunately that company is located about 30 minutes north of us and was also caught in the same storm front.

The results, as some of you may have noticed, were some intermittent outages all day today.(I believe we were down about an hour total, in about four separate incidents.)

I applaud those of you who braved the elements and stuck with us, including Dzenana looking for Macroeconomics homework help on market equilibrium, and those who even managed to keep a sense of humor.  You're the real storm troopers.

I drink alot of coffee, perhaps too much. (OK, not perhaps. Definitely too much.) Anyway, had to laugh at this story on BBC about animal dung coffee being sold in London.

First of all, I'm appalled that anybody would put anything into Jamaican Blue Mountain. It is the best coffee I've ever had, and should not be spoiled with any sort of mixer -- not cream, not sugar, nothing. Drink it black to enjoy the flavor. Anyway, they mix it with Kopi Luwak beans (of which I've never heard before), which are apparently really good.

So where does the animal dung come into play? According to the article, the Kopi Luwak beans are eaten by the Asian palm civet, which only eats the best beans. The civet's digestive system breaks down the flesh of the fruit, leaving the bean undigested when it is "passed".

The "passed" beans are harvested and, in a critical processing step, thoroughly washed. The cleansed beans are then roasted, mixed, brewed, etc. yielding what must be one mean cup of Crappuccino.

No animal dung is harmed in the making of this coffee. Still, some people will drink anything, I guess. 

The recent outcry by the Obama's campaign over unauthorized access into his passport, (Obama Passport Scandal) brought to mind one thought...the candidate and party who's solution to all is "more government" is complaining because government was bad. Now they will cast it as the administration's fault,  and that a government run by their administration will (of course) be better and not have these types of problems.

The unfortunate part of all of this is the State Department employee who opened the files on Obama, McCain, and Clinton are probably not direct hires of the current administration, but are more likely life-long government bureaucrats, who pretty much stick in the government regardless of which party is currently in power.

This incident concerns a passport which is a federal government document, and even though it is a clear violation of privacy, it is information that the government has created on its citizens for the purpose of security.

Now let's expand the problem and look at making health-care a part of this same government bureaucracy. The intentions are good and are designed for the well being of all, to provide nothing less than the best health care in the world. The government will have all of our medical records on file, from the smallest wart removal to the cancer that is ravaging our bodies. The government will help us make decisions for what is best for our lives and administer care with the utmost compassion. It sounds great!

It will be the same compassionate system that helps the poor out in times of trouble. We all know they would have to be the most compassionate bureaucracy in the system, right next to the streamlined and efficient Social Security administration...

The reality is that bureaucracy (more government) is not the answer to our problems just as Obama and Clinton have experienced lately. More government means more potential for abuse, because there is no good government except for the one that is limited with checks and balances.

Just think what the next election cycle could look like: similar security breaches in a national health-care system could end up dropping bombs like "this candidate had to be treated for STD's three times" and "this one is going through hormone replacement therapy." It could be interesting and really dirty, not to mention highly illegal. Is this what you want?

My brother brought his digital SLR camera to Tampa, and told me he bought a new lens. Wow! It's a 100/400 zoom, and it looks alot like a small thermos. Hook it up to the front of your camera, though, and you can count the catcher's nosehairs from the centerfield bleachers.

Joe must have taken about 300 shots, many of which were guys taking pitches or swinging and missing. He did catch some interesting poses and subjects, and I've been endeavoring to post some up here.

Check the Spring Training folder under the list of my blog entries to see such highlights as Billy Crystal's "Shot heard round the coffee table" and Ryan Howard's unique take on the Presidential election... 

The players play on, but my time among them is done. I boarded a plane yesterday evening for the long flight home, and this morning am back into the swing of things. (A bit bleary eyed to be sure, but back.)

I've done this spring training thing a few years now, and it's always been a great way to recharge the cells and remind me of the great times I had playing ball and watching games as a kid. Life tends to get more serious as we get older, despite our best efforts to the contrary. Trips like these, though, can help us push back against that trend, even if only for a short time and for only a little bit.